Editorial: Rethinking Gladstone’s Approach to Code Enforcement
As Summer gets under way, the lawn cops are busing measuring the grass. In Gladstone, a growing point of contention is the city’s practice of placing large, conspicuous signs in residents’ yards to indicate code violations — often for something as minor as grass that exceeds the height limit by a few inches. Because nothing says ‘good governance’ like spending tax dollars on lawn-shaming signs. While code enforcement is a legitimate and necessary function, the current approach raises questions about proportionality, resource allocation, and community relations.
A discreet notice on the door or a mailed letter would be sufficient to inform a property owner of a violation. Yard signs, by contrast, not only generate unnecessary expense for printing and placement, but also risk publicly embarrassing residents over relatively minor infractions. This method does little to foster cooperation or goodwill.
At a time when cities face pressing challenges — from infrastructure needs to public safety — Gladstone would be better served by focusing its enforcement efforts on matters that significantly impact the community, rather than engaging in practices that appear more punitive than practical. Lets just hope it doesn't come to scarlet letters for unapproved garden gnomes
Comments